Information about heights of various sites.

The Western Manhood is very low lying and large areas are in a flood plain. For that reason the actual heights of these sites is critical and is measured in meters above a well defined reference point called Above Ordnance Datum (A.O.D.) Think of AOD as very being roughly sea level for simplicity’s sake.

The table below shows all the planning applications for the Western Manhood Peninsula of ten or more dwellings that have been lodged with CDC in the last ten years. Some of these are already built, some are approved but not yet built and some are pending the CDC decision or awaiting the outcome of an appeal by the developer.

They are sorted by the minimum heights of the site. The “Application No.” and the ” Reference” are hyperlinked so will take you directly to the respective planniong portal or the source of this data – typically flood risk assessments commissioned by the developer.

Heights of sites AOD
QtyApplic. No.WhereMinMaxReferenceColumn1
30823/01967/FULEIAMedmerry Park1.64.2HerringtonLodge floore 4.44 AOD
10020/03125/OUTBarratts, Clappers Lane2.75.2CEP letter
11014/01806/outWates Clappers Lane3.135.584.8 floor levels
3020/02236/OUTEarnley Concourse3.725.54RSK
5012/02461/fulBeech Avenue3.864.67Wates FRA
8518/00753/outSouth Downs Holiday Park4.125.12SWP FRA
1712/03749/fulPiggery Hall Lane4.185Stuart Michael FRAFllor levels 5.85
2616/01020/fulStocks Lane4.65Mott MacDonald
4522/02235/OUTBarratts 45,Church Rd.4.685.96Pell Frishmann
28522/02214/FULEIABarratts 285, Church Road4.685.96Pell Frischmann
6521/01376/OUTEmeray,Bracklesham Lane4.85.3Roberst Clark Assoc letter
5013/03286/fulChaucer Drive4.835.08MJA Consulting
7020/02491/OUTWelbeck,Church Road4.885.36Pell Frishmann4.43 living. 4.77 sleeping
1423/00067/FULRussels Nurseries5.66.2CGS Civils
15021/01830/OUTGladman1,Birdham Main Rd.5.836.9
15023/1497/OUTGladman2,Birdham Main Rd5.836.9

A graphic often provides digestible information as opposed to dry data so the chart below takes the data from the above table and presents it as a bar chart. The lowest sites are at the left and the highest at the right.

The solid black line is the minimum height of the two Barratts sites in Church Road East Wittering where CDC planning officers and the planning committee rejected the applications. Of the ten reasons for rejection, flood risk was paramount. The bars for these sites are marked “Rejected – flood risk”

So applying the same logic all bars/sites to the left of these two are risky but nothing can be done about those already built but there are three sites where outline planning permission has been granted ….